Sudan’s Case at ICJ: A Politically Charged Narrative Over Global Humanitarian Efforts
-
Editor
- . April 11, 2025
- . Update: April 11, 2025 2:37 pm
On April 10, 2025, the International Court of Justice in The Hague started public hearings due to a legal action filed by Sudan’s military. A Gulf country is sued for arming the Rapid Support Forces that committed genocide during Sudan’s civil war. Sudanese lawyers maintain that the government is concerned its Masalit population in need of urgent ICJ intervention.
The world rejects these serious charges because governments say they come from political reasons and need actual evidence to prove them. Several experts believe that Sudan is using this lawsuit as a public relations to push away attention from its domestic problems.
The year 2023 sees Sudan in a deep humanitarian crisis as fighting between national soldiers and the RSF causes tens of thousands of deaths and sends over 12 million people from their homes. The country serving as its target has donated substantial support for humanitarian aid to Sudan. The nation provided $3.5 billion worth of humanitarian support over the last decade, with $600 million invested since April 2023.
When ICJ examined the situation they found that Sudan turned down an offer to build a medical center in conflict zones plus shunned talks that might bring peace. The evidence shows that Sudan’s domestic politics differ from the good intentions of outside nations who want to help.
The accused nation works to maintain peace and stability in Sudan through massive funding from global powers including EU, UK, US, and Japan while their EU donations top €280 million. Their continued charity work shows that Sudan lied to the court while showing their lasting dedication to support people in that region. People wonder if nation-wide legal proceedings at ICJ exist for justice purposes or to divert attention from immediate national issues.
